George's Ghost
(written in 2000 - we spoke to numerous papers about this and even did a TV interview. Later I met a man who said he was the ghost - but that's another story)
(written in 2000 - we spoke to numerous papers about this and even did a TV interview. Later I met a man who said he was the ghost - but that's another story)
Over recent weeks there has been press
coverage of the ghost in the Dome.
George Livesey is a subject well known to me – of an undergraduate
project and then an MPhil. I have written
several articles and thought the Forum might like to know more about him.
There had to be a silly season story about
the Dome site. If there has to be a
ghost why not that of manipulative,
irrepressible George Livesey. Anyone who
reads through the otherwise dry as dust records of the Victorian gas industry will
find that George enlivened proceedings very considerably – I think he really
enjoyed upsetting proceedings. A
haunting of his old gas works is well in line with his normal behaviour in life
- and in any case there is no way he could have kept his nose out of the Dome.
He always jumped in. Until now I didn't think I believed in ghosts – George is
making me change my mind. He always
challenged convention, so why not now, ninety years after his death?
I am sorry if the following account of his
life is somewhat personalised. I have been working on George a long time
now. I first came across him when I was
set the 1889 gas workers strike as an undergraduate project. I read my way through the South Met Gas
Company Minute Books to look for Will Thorne et al but it soon became clear
that the most interesting thing about the strike was the Company's Chairman.
Livesey rampaged his way through South Met Board meetings at an astonishing
rate. It was very exciting reading!
Most things written about Livesey have been
about the great 1889 strike and such academic discussion as there has been has
discreetly wondered if the whole thing was in fact simply a stitch up by
Livesey. Anyone who could provoke thousands of workers to strike against
better pay and conditions has to be a bit different. What none of the academics has noticed is
that at the same time as his ex-workers fought the police in the streets and/or
starved, that Livesey was addressing mass rallies of working class people in
his other role of a leader in the Band of Hope.
In the context of the 1889 strike I have
seen a number of agitrop productions in which he was portrayed as the
conventional top hatted, cigar smoking capitalist. That, I can guarantee, he was not. His
grandfather was a greengrocer in Bethnal Green.
George's father was manager of the Old Kent Road gas works and he was
brought up in a house on site. He went
to work in the offices there at the age fourteen. No one has ever provided
evidence that he went to school. His
education was in the gas works and with other boys in the Old Kent Road. As a teenager he attended a meeting to set up
the London Band of Hope and he became an activist. These young men in the Victorian Temperance
movement must have had much in common with the Socialist Workers of today. Selling papers on street corners, holding
meetings, using every opportunity to get the message over. George stayed with it all his life and
perhaps it was in the schismatical and proselytizing temperance movement of
south London in which he felt most at home.
George's father had taken over the fraud
ridden, and recently explosive Old Kent Road gas works in 1840 with a
mission. He intended it simply to become
the most efficient gas works there ever was.
He passed on to George this message and said that objectives could only
be achieved with absolute probity.
George's version of truth was sometimes a bit varied but his reputation
was absolute. He was to work for South Met. all his life.
His father died suddenly in 1870 yet the
Board hesitated before appointing George in his father's place. Probably with
good reason. He was to take them to a lot of places to which they would
probably have rather not gone. He was
appointed as both company secretary and works engineer. He was to say himself that this was useful
since the Board could sack the engineer but could not get rid of the secretary
without a vote among the shareholders.
He set about selling shares to those members of his workforce who had
been his boyhood chums.
Within two years of his appointment,
without his Board's consent, he had done a deal with the Board of Trade, which
was to change the financial rules by which all gas company's worked out their
prices and profits. Soon no other gas company
manager would speak to him and his own Board spent a lot of time trying to
explain it all away. His message was
'partnership' - which meant that gas companies had to be responsible towards
their customers (then mainly local authorities) and work with them. If they wouldn't do this themselves they
should be forced to. He put forward the idea of payment by result to start with
his own salary.
It was just ten years between his
appointment as manager to his retirement.
In that time he propelled South Met from being a small backwater among
London gas companies into what was probably the premier gas company in the
world. Governments of the day were keen
to persuade old small gas companies to become large efficient ones. George took this up with enthusiasm and had
to be stopped by the Board of Trade from negotiating himself into control of
the whole London gas industry. There
were a number of other skirmishes. No
cause was to obscure. George would take anything up.
He retired in 1881 and was elected as
Company chair shortly after the presentation of the silver teaspoons. His next mission was to build East Greenwich
Gas works and to reform the rest of the gas industry and bring it round to his
way of thinking One of the things I like about George is that even as a major
industrialist he was never too proud not to go to other company meetings and
have a shout up from the back. I admire his talents as a speaker so much. I have read my way through so my potentially
boring transcripts of public enquiries, reports of company meetings and so on
which were revolutionized by George. He
had that ability to walk into a meeting, and say 'Look, this it how it is' and
to change the agenda, to change how people think.
East Greenwich gas works, the site of this
current haunting, was built in the 1880s. Being done by George, it had to be
perfect. The two great gas holders symbolized it all. They were the biggest in
the world, they were austere and 'modern' in design - shouting 'progress', 'simplicity' and
'function'.
Hopefully they would also annoy the management at hated Beckton.
After the 1889 strike episode he was
politically suspect and was initially taken up by an unsavoury group of 'liberty
and property' protectors, who he quickly dropped. By the time he died some co-operators had
begun to let him speak at their meetings. He was probably much more at home
with them. He was however eventually
knighted.
He had provoked the 1889 strike by
instigating the third wing of 'partnership' - to include the workforce in with
a profit sharing deal. His timing for this
is very suspect despite his story of a messianic vision on Telegraph Hill - the
only park commemorating strike breaking.
Thorough to the last George wanted Board places for workers against the
wishes of the existing Board and the House of Commons. He set out to make South
Met the perfect example of partnership between capital and labour, with every
possible consultation and/or welfare arrangement. It all went smoothly as long as he got his own way all the time. The scheme was based on share ownership by
the workforce and he began to say a number of quite revolutionary things about
property ownership.
Recent press coverage has remarked on the
number of people who followed his coffin to Nunhead cemetery. Why not?
He really had done the best he could for South London. Or he meant to - and I am sure people knew he
intended to be a good man.
Why did someone so talented stay in south
London? Perhaps that is why he has come back - he sees the Dome as being a
chance for an appearance on the national and international stage? Perhaps his enthusiasm for everything he ever
encountered has spilt over. If anyone had to come back to see what was going on
it would have to be George. He just couldn't stay away.
No comments:
Post a Comment